Artificial intelligence has been widely described as the driving force behind a new entrepreneurial wave across North America. The narrative is compelling: AI reduces costs, shortens timelines, and lowers skill requirements, enabling more people to start businesses than ever before. But the key question remains. Is this genuinely an entrepreneurial revolution, or are we watching another cycle of technological hype that benefits a select group while leaving others behind?
This article takes a data-driven look at the evidence, focusing on adoption rates, productivity gains, infrastructure limitations, and regulatory environments in both Canada and the United States.
According to Gusto’s 2025 New Business Formation report, 47 percent of new businesses in the United States reported using generative AI in their first year. This is a sharp increase from 21 percent the previous year. The scale of growth suggests that AI is moving from experimental to mainstream use much faster than earlier technologies such as cloud computing or e-commerce platforms.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce reported in late 2024 that 40 percent of small businesses were actively using AI tools. Axios cited a U.S. Bank poll showing 36 percent adoption with another 21 percent planning to adopt within a year. Taken together, these data points indicate that adoption is no longer limited to early adopters or large firms.
Stripe’s analysis of AI companies provides additional evidence. The top 100 AI companies reached key revenue milestones significantly faster than previous generations of software firms. While those numbers come from AI-focused startups, the broader implication is clear: the speed of business cycles is accelerating. This matters because shorter build times and reduced costs affect not only tech firms but also smaller, service-based businesses that can now leverage AI-driven platforms.
For small and midsize businesses, AI is performing functions that previously required multiple employees or external contractors. Shopify’s small business survey found that 48 percent of AI-using businesses reported productivity improvements, while 45 percent noted better customer experience metrics.
Key applications include:
The practical outcome is reduced reliance on upfront investment. Non-technical founders can combine AI with no-code platforms to launch credible products and services while deferring major hires until revenue grows.
Canada illustrates how program design and regulatory uncertainty can undermine adoption. The Canada Digital Adoption Program (CDAP) supported over 70,000 businesses in adopting digital tools. However, the program stopped accepting new applications in 2024. This leaves small firms without a federal support structure at a time when AI demand is increasing.
Ontario’s Centre of Innovation has expanded its Digital Modernization and Adoption Plan (DMAP), offering up to 15,000 dollars for planning assistance. While useful, this program is localized and does not address the national gap.
Regulatory uncertainty compounds the issue. Bill C-27, Canada’s proposed AI legislation, was dissolved when Parliament was prorogued. This creates a fragmented regulatory landscape where provinces and courts fill the void. For businesses, the lack of federal clarity increases legal and compliance risks, particularly in areas such as privacy, data governance, and vendor accountability.
The United States has taken a more structured approach. The Small Business Administration (SBA) has introduced AI guidance tailored for small businesses and integrated resources into the nationwide SBDC network. A 10 million dollar grant from Google.org is funding AI-U clinics hosted at universities and community colleges, targeting 100,000 businesses.
On regulation, the Stanford AI Index recorded a significant increase in federal AI-related actions in 2024. Sector-specific frameworks are emerging in finance, healthcare, and employment, with a focus on compliance and transparency. For entrepreneurs, this means the operating environment is tightening, but with more predictable rules than in Canada.
One critical barrier remains: internet access. AI tools are only as effective as the connectivity supporting them.
In practice, businesses in underserved regions face slower adoption and fewer competitive advantages. Infrastructure is the silent variable that determines whether AI’s benefits are broadly shared or narrowly concentrated.
For AI-driven entrepreneurship to become more than a concentrated phenomenon, three policy priorities are evident:
The data shows real progress. AI adoption among small businesses has accelerated, productivity gains are measurable, and cost barriers are falling. Yet, structural issues such as rural internet access, regulatory uncertainty in Canada, and uneven diffusion across sectors mean that the term “entrepreneurial revolution” may be premature.
For some businesses, AI is a transformative enabler. For others, particularly in regions without adequate infrastructure or policy support, it remains an inaccessible promise. The evidence suggests that AI is not a universal revolution but rather a disruptive force creating both opportunities and inequalities.
Artificial intelligence is undeniably reshaping entrepreneurship in North America. The data confirms that more businesses are adopting AI earlier in their journey, using it to boost productivity, and reducing the need for upfront capital. However, without stronger infrastructure, clearer rules, and targeted policies to diffuse adoption, the benefits risk clustering among firms that already have advantages.
The revolution is real for some, but conditional for many. The outcome depends not only on the technology itself but also on whether governments, institutions, and businesses address the structural gaps that still hold back a truly inclusive transformation.
No Comments